Ask Our Doctors – Archive
Our Medical Directors are outstanding physicians that you will find to be very personable and compassionate, who take care to ensure that you have the most cutting-edge fertility treatments at your disposal. This is your outlet to ask your questions to the doctors.
Hi doctor!i am 37 years old i had in 2008 a healhy baby girl.In 2009 i had a completely molar pregnancy with 6 cycles of methotrexaty.in 2012 i had another cmp no need methotrexaty.how can i have a second baby with no risk of a 3rd molar?i come from greece and my doctor said ivf with donor egg….
We should talk!
Call Patti at 702-533-2691 to set up a Skype consultation.
A hydatidiform molar pregnancy happens when tissue that normally forms the placenta instead becomes a growth, that triggers symptoms of pregnancy. A hydatidiform mole is a benign tumor of the root system (trophoblast) of the embryo which under normal conditions develops into the placenta which connects the baby to the mother. About 1 out of 2,000 women with early pregnancy symptoms will have a molar pregnancy. It is approximately twice as common in women of Asian extraction.The condition requires urgent treatment and follow-up to avoid serious complications that can involve invasion of the uterine wall and surrounding structures (i.e. invasive mole or chorioadenoma destruens) or malignant change (choriocarcinoma)
In more than 25% of early pregnancies there will be some vaginal bleeding. About one half of these end up by miscarrying. In the remaining half, the bleeding subsides and the pregnancy continues to evolve such that most will culminate in a healthy live birth. In less than 2% of cases of such bleeding the cause of early pregnancy bleeding is hydatidiform mole (molar) pregnancy. With molar pregnancy, the roots of the trophoblast (chorionic villi) undergo cystic degeneration and when the woman bleeds, these cystic structures are passed in dark blood, giving rise to the common description of “white currents floating in red currant jelly”.
In non-molar pregnancies, an inevitable miscarriage almost invariably presents with flattening or declining blood pregnancy hormone (i.e. hCG) levels. Conversely, with hydatidiform mole the blood hCG concentration is usually elevated continues to rise. In addition, the woman will often experience exaggerated pregnancy symptoms (e.g. pernicious vomiting, very frequent urination and bloating) and lower abdominal cramping. On examination, she will often be found to have a markedly elevated blood pressure. On abdominal or vaginal examination here uterus is commonly enlarged beyond that which can be explained on the basis of the duration of pregnancy. Ultrasound examination usually (but not invariably) reveals a hazy, so called “snow storm pattern” and the absence of a conceptus.
There are two types of hydatidiform mole, complete or partial
•Complete Hydatidiform mole: Like normal pregnancies the complete mole has 46 chromosomes (two sets of 23), i.e. it is diploid.. However unlike with normal fertilization where one set of chromosomes comes from the mother and the other set from the father, with a complete molar pregnancy both sets of chromosomes come from the father. This is the result from duplication of a sperm’s chromosomes after it has fertilized an “inactive egg”. Since an embryo that has a YY karyotype is not viable, the chromosome gender of the molar pregnancy is invariably XX (female). Accordingly, if with IVF, one avoids transferring an embryo that by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is found to be female (XX) and selectively transfers only male (XY) embryos the possibility of a complete molar pregnancy can be virtually eliminated. A complete molar pregnancy can result from fertilization of an “inactive egg” by 2 separate spermatozoa. Injection of a single sperm by ICSI avoids the latter from occurring altogether. In <10% of cases a complete Hydatidform molar pregnancy can be inherited due to a mutation (not yet clearly identified) involving chromosome 19. In such cases molar pregnancies can occur repetitively and the mole can have an XX or an XY chromosomal configuration. It should be borne in mind however, that not all repetitive molar pregnancies are due to this mutation. Complete molar pregnancies can also run in families (e.g. in sisters). The true incidence of this genetic mutation is still unknown. This situation cannot be identified by PGD.
•Partial (placental) molar pregnancies are usually triploid [i.e. their cells contain three sets of (23each) chromosomes]. Thus with partial moles, the sex chromosome configuration will be XXY or XYY. Partial Hydatidform molar can therefore be avoided through selectively transferring embryos where through PGD triploidy has been excluded.
More than 80% of molar pregnancies are benign (noncancerous). Treatment involves complete emptying of the uterus as soon as the diagnosis is made. Even in cases where a spontaneous passage of the molar tissue appears to be complete. The reason is to avoid the development of an invasive mole (chorioadenoma destruens), where the uterine wall is permeated by remaining tissue and to limit the development of choriocarcinoma (where the molar tissue becomes malignant). In the vast majority of properly managed cases however, outcome after treatment is usually excellent. Close follow-up with serial quantitative blood hCG testing, ultrasound and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is essential. After treatment, the woman must use very effective contraception for at least 6 to 12 months so as to avoid pregnancy in order to allow for proper follow-up.
Choriocarcinoma is a very malignant tumor that invades the uterus and can spread rapidly via the blood system to bone, lungs, brain and other sites. Fortunately choriocarcinoma does respond well to hysterectomy and removal of ovaries with aggressive, selective chemotherapy.
While Molar pregnancy is not commonly seen in patients undergoing IVF, it does occur and the vigilant doctor should always be on the look-out for it. As indicated, in cases where a woman seeking IVF has a family history of the condition or has had a prior molar pregnancy herself, PGD can provide an efficient way to all but prevent this condition from occurring.
Geoff Sher
Hello. Thank you for this service you are doing.
I have just recently turned 43, and had one natural, spontaneous pregnancy at age 40, achieved accidentally when we were not diligent with birth control for one cycle. That pregnancy resulted in my healthy almost 3 year old son.
I terminated for medical reasons (trisomy confirmed by CVS) in April 2019 at 19.5 weeks after a successful IUI.
Since then, we have turned to IVF, specifically to take advantage of PGS testing.
We have done three rounds of egg retrieval. Two of which are complete, with PGS results in, resulting in 8 embryos frozen. We attempted one frozen embryo transfer last month with a PGS-tested normal 5 Day 4AB embryo. It did not take. All of my tests (thyroid, ERA, hysteroscopy, etc) are normal. Male factor is excellent.
Today is Day 3 post our third egg retrieval/IVF round. As of today, we have have 5 “good” embryos and 1 “poor” one. Hopefully when all is said and done we will have at least one more PGS-normal embryo to bank.
The above is background to give you context for my question, which is— of the embryos we currently have in the bank, do you recommend any of the abnormal ones for transfer? (Obviously we would try with the remaining normal one first.)
Below are the results of the PGS testing from the 8 embryos we already created (including the one that failed FET.) There will hopefully be more to add to the list after we get the results from this latest IVF round.
Again, the question is: of these (apart from the obvious the Day 6 3AB normal one) do you see any as candidates for attempted transfer?
Thank you in advance for any insight you are able to offer.
First Round
Embryo #1 (4AB) Day 5 — Abnormal Male +12, +22
Embryo #2 (4AB) Day 5 — Abnormal Male chaotic
Embryo #3 (3AB) Day 6 — NORMAL Male
Embryo #4 (4AA) Day 6 — Abnormal Male +7, -21
Second Round
Embryo #5 (4AB) Day 5 NORMAL MALE — FAILED FET 9/20/19 — CHEMICAL PREGNANCY
Embryo #6 (5AB) Day 6 Abnormal Male (-16)
Embryo #7 (3BB) Day 6 Complex Abnormal Female (+1, +6, -10, +12)
Embryo #8 (4BB) Day 6 Abnormal Male (+20)
Embryos #s 1,4,6 & 8 are worth consideration. Discuss with your RE.
Geoff Sher
Hi Doc, I’m 44 and I got 2 of my embryos tested and below are the results.
Embryo Grading: 4BB
PGT Results: 47, XY, -13, +20, +22; Aneuploidy: monosomy 13, trisomy 20, 22
Embryo Grading: 3AB
PGT Results: Female; Complex aneuploidies
Can any of these be implanted? Is the second one enough information for you to determine or do I need to get more details from the lab?
I would be somewhat reluctant to use them.
Geoff Sher
My endometrium is 5.4 mm thick on day 11 of my frozen cycle. Is this too thin?
Far too thin.
It was as far back as 1989, when I first published a study that examined the correlation between the thickness of a woman’s uterine lining (the endometrium), and the subsequent successful implantation of embryos in IVF patients. This study revealed that when the uterine lining measured <8mm in thickness by the day of the “hCG trigger” (in fresh IVF cycles), or at the time of initiating progesterone therapy (in embryo recipient cycles, e.g. frozen embryo transfers-FET, egg donation-IVF etc.) , pregnancy and birth rates were substantially improved. Currently, it is my opinion, that an ideal estrogen-promoted endometrial lining should ideally measure at least 9mm in thickness and that an endometrial lining measuring 8-9mm is “intermediate”. An estrogenic lining of <8mm is in most cases unlikely to yield a viable pregnancy.
A “poor” uterine lining is usually the result of the innermost layer of endometrium (the basal or germinal endometrium from which endometrium grows) ) not being able to respond to estrogen by propagating an outer, “functional” layer thick enough to support optimal embryo implantation and development of a healthy placenta (placentation). The “functional” layer ultimately comprises 2/3 of the full endometrial thickness and is the layer that sheds with menstruation in the event that no pregnancy occurs.
The main causes of a “poor” uterine lining are:
1.Damage to the basal endometrium as a result of:
a.Inflammation of the endometrium (endometritis) most commonly resulting from infected products left over following abortion, miscarriage or birth
b.Surgical trauma due to traumatic uterine scraping, (i.e. due to an over-aggressive D & C)
2.Insensitivity of the basal endometrium to estrogen due to:
a.Prolonged , over-use/misuse of clomiphene citrate
b.Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). This is a drug that was given to pregnant women in the 1960’s to help prevent miscarriage
3.Over-exposure of the uterine lining to ovarian male hormones (mainly testosterone): Older women, women with diminished ovarian reserve (poor responders) and women with polycystic ovarian syndrome -PCOS tend to have raised LH biological activity.. This causes the connective tissue in the ovary (stroma/theca) to overproduce testosterone. The effect can be further exaggerated when certain methods for ovarian stimulation such as agonist (Lupron/Buserelin) “flare” protocols and high dosages of menotropins such as Menopur are used in such cases.
4.Reduced blood flow to the basal endometrium:
Examples include;
a.Multiple uterine fibroids - especially when these are present under the endometrium (submucosal)
b.Uterine adenomyosis (excessive, abnormal invasion of the uterine muscle by endometrial glands).
“The Viagra Connection”
Eighteen years ago years ago, after reporting on the benefit of vaginal Sildenafil (Viagra) for to women who had implantation dysfunction due to thin endometrial linings I was proud to announce the birth of the world’s first “Viagra baby.” Since the introduction of this form of treatment, thousands of women with thin uterine linings have been reported treated and many have gone on to have babies after repeated prior IVF failure.
For those of you who aren’t familiar with the use of Viagra in IVF, allow me to provide some context. It was in the 90’s that Sildenafil (brand named Viagra) started gaining popularity as a treatment for erectile dysfunction. The mechanism by which it acted was through increasing penile blood flow through increasing nitric oxide activity. This prompted me to investigate whether Viagra administered vaginally, might similarly improve uterine blood flow and in the process cause more estrogen to be delivered to the basal endometrium and thereby increase endometrial thickening. We found that when Viagra was administered vaginally it did just that! However oral administration was without any significant benefit in this regard. We enlisted the services of a compound pharmacy to produce vaginal Viagra suppositories. Initially, four (4) women with chronic histories of poor endometrial development and failure to conceive following several advanced fertility treatments were evaluated for a period of 4-6 weeks and then underwent IVF with concomitant Viagra therapy. Viagra suppositories were administered four times daily for 8-11 days and were discontinued 5-7 days prior to embryo transfer in all cases.
Our findings clearly demonstrated that vaginal Viagra produced a rapid and profound improvement in uterine blood flow and that was followed by enhanced endometrial development in all four cases. Three (3) of the four women subsequently conceived. I expanded the trial in 2002 and became the first to report on the administration of vaginal Viagra to 105 women with repeated IVF failure due to persistently thin endometrial linings. All of the women had experienced at least two (2) prior IVF failures attributed to intractably thin uterine linings. About 70% of these women responded to treatment with Viagra suppositories with a marked improvement in endometrial thickness. Forty five percent (45%) achieved live births following a single cycle of IVF treatment with Viagra The miscarriage rate was 9%. None of the women who had failed to show an improvement in endometrial thickness following Viagra treatment achieved viable pregnancies.
Following vaginal administration, Viagra is rapidly absorbed and quickly reaches the uterine blood system in high concentrations. Thereupon it dilutes out as it is absorbed into the systemic circulation. This probably explains why treatment is virtually devoid of systemic side effects
It is important to recognize that Viagra will NOT be effective in improving endometrial thickness in all cases. In fact, about 30%-40% of women treated fail to show any improvement. This is because in certain cases of thin uterine linings, the basal endometrium will have been permanently damaged and left unresponsive to estrogen. This happens in cases of severe endometrial damage due mainly to post-pregnancy endometritis (inflammation), chronic granulomatous inflammation due to uterine tuberculosis (hardly ever seen in the United States) and following extensive surgical injury to the basal endometrium (as sometimes occurs following over-zealous D&C’s).
Combining vaginal Viagra Therapy with oral Terbutaline;
In my practice I sometimes recommend combining Viagra administration with 5mg of oral terbutaline. The Viagra relaxes the muscle walls of uterine spiral arteries that feed the basal (germinal) layer of the endometrium while Terbutaline, relaxes the uterine muscle through which these spiral arteries pass. The combination of these two medications interacts synergistically to maximally enhance blood flow through the uterus, thereby improving estrogen delivery to the endometrial lining. The only drawback in using Terbutaline is that some women experience agitation, tremors and palpitations. In such cases the terbutaline should be discontinued. Terbutaline should also not be used women who have cardiac disease or in those who have an irregular heartbeat.
About 75% of women with thin uterine linings see a positive response to treatment within 2-3 days. The ones that do not respond well to this treatment are those who have severely damaged inner (basal/germinal) endometrial linings, such that no improvement in uterine blood flow can coax an improved response. Such cases are most commonly the result of prior pregnancy-related endometrial inflammation (endometritis) that sometimes occurs post abortally or following infected vaginal and/or cesarean delivery.
Viagra therapy has proven to be a god send to thousands of woman who because of a thin uterine lining would otherwise never have been able to successfully complete the journey “from infertility to family”.
___________________________________________________
ADDENDUM: PLEASE READ!!
INTRODUCING SHER FERTILITY SOLUTIONS (SFS)
Hitherto I have personally performed IVF- treatment and related procedures on patients who, elected to travel to Las Vegas to be managed by me. However, with the launching of Sher-Fertility Solutions (SFS) in April 2019, I have taken on a new and expanded role. Now, rather than having hands-on involvement I confine my services to providing hour-long online Skype consultations to an ever-growing number of patients (emanating from >40 countries), with complex Reproductive problems, who seek access to my input, advice and guidance. All Skype consultations are followed by a detailed written report that meticulously describes and explains my recommendations for treatment. All patients are encouraged to share this report with their personal treating doctor(s), with whom [subject to consent and a request from their doctor] I will, gladly discuss their case with the “treating Physician”.
Through SFS I am now able to conveniently provide those who because of geography, convenience and cost, prefer to be treated at home or elsewhere by their chosen Infertility Physician.
“I wish to emphasize to all patients with whom I consult, that in the final analyses, when it comes to management, strategy, protocol and implementation of treatment, my advice and recommendations are always superseded by that of the hands-on treating Physician”.
Anyone wishing to schedule a Skype consultation with me, can do so by: Calling my concierge (Patti Converse) at 1-800-780-7437 (in the U.S.A or Canada) or 702-533-2691, for an appointment. Patients can also enroll online on my website, http://www.SherIVF.com, or email Patti at concierge@SherIVF.com .
I was very recently greatly honored in receiving an award by the prestigious; International Association of Top Professionals (IAOTP). For more information, go to the press release on my website, http://www.sherIVF.com .
PLEASE HELP SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT SFS!
Hi Dr. Sher,
We had a 5-day blastocyst transfer on 10/8. Went for first beta HCG on 10/15 and it came out 12.6 only, then second beta just today 10/21 resulted to 12.84 only.. So it only increased by 0.24 in the span of 6 days. Our doctor said it is not looking good as it should have doubled/tripled by this time but asked us to continue Progesterone meds and come back on 10/26 for third beta HCG and ultrasound to rule out ectopic pregnancy. Any chance this could still be a viable pregnancy? Thanks.
Unfortunately, this does not look promising.
Geoff Sher