Ask Our Doctors – Archive

Our Medical Directors are outstanding physicians that you will find to be very personable and compassionate, who take care to ensure that you have the most cutting-edge fertility treatments at your disposal. This is your outlet to ask your questions to the doctors.

19,771 Comments

  1. Hi Dr. Sher, I’m hope ing you can give me some advice on my situation. I am 37 years old with factor V Leiden heterozygous, and a history of multiple miscarriages, second trimester loss, and preterm labor. I have had IVF twice. The first fresh cycle resulted in a quad pregnancy (2 embryos transferred, both split) which I lost. The second frozen cycle 2 years ago gave my my daughter (2 embryos transferred). I developed adenomyosis after the birth of my daughter, and am trying for my last round of IVF with my 2 remaining frozen embryos, which is not going well and will likely be cancelled on Monday. I was on bcp, Lupron, 8mg of estrogen pills, My lining is thin, I have fluid iny uterus, and an in terrible pain, which I never had in past cycles. After the birth of my daughter in 11/2015, I never stopped bleeding. The doctors put me on bcp with additional 1-2mg estrogen daily just to get my bleeding to stop 8 months later. I had a biopsy and was told I was otherwise fine, but I’ve been on so much estrogen just to stop bleeding since she was born. My RE did a saline u/s and saw evidence of adenomyosis in 3/17, and with my constant pain, said I have adenomyosis and if I want a chance at a last baby with my frozen embryos, I needed to do it soon, which leads me to now. Do you feel there is any hope for me? I don’t feel confident in my current off protocol, but my doctor thought it was best. They had me start take progesterone, doxycycline, and prednisone, and I will see on Monday if that helps and if I can transfer, but I have a lot of pain and don’t want to transfer if my chances aren’t good. Do you feel there would be a better protocol or more testing my RE should be doing first? I truly appreciate any guidance you can offer me. This is my last chance with IVF, and it means so much h to me. I’ve had 12 losses total, so this is a big decision. Thank you for any help.

    • It is in my opinion not possible to diagnose adenomyosis reliably by ultrasound. You need an MRI. This having been said, if present, adenomyosis can adversely affect the development of an adequate uterine lining. More commonly, the cause of a poor lining (<8mm) is due to damage done by endometritis after a pregnancy with retained products of conception. Additionally, it is estrogen, rather than progesterone is needed to thicken the lining...in my opinion.

      About seventeen years ago, after reporting on the benefit of vaginal Sildenafil (Viagra) for to women who had implantation dysfunction due to thin endometrial linings I was proud to announce the birth of the world’s first “Viagra baby.” For those of you who aren’t familiar with the use of Viagra in IVF, allow me to provide some context.

      It was as far back as 1989, when I first published a study that examined the correlation between the thickness of a woman’s uterine lining (the endometrium), and the subsequent successful implantation of embryos in IVF patients. This study revealed that when the uterine lining measured <8mm in thickness by the day of the “hCG trigger” (in fresh IVF cycles), or at the time of initiating progesterone therapy (in embryo recipient cycles, e.g. frozen embryo transfers, egg donation-IVF etc.) , pregnancy and birth rates were substantially improved. Currently, it is my opinion, that an ideal estrogen-promoted endometrial lining should ideally measure at least 9mm in thickness and that an endometrial lining measuring 8-9mm is “intermediate”. An estrogenic lining of <8mm is in most cases unlikely to yield a viable pregnancy.

      A “poor” uterine lining is usually the result of the innermost layer of endometrium (the basal or germinal endometrium from which endometrium grows) ) not being able to respond to estrogen by propagating an outer, “functional” layer thick enough to support optimal embryo implantation and development of a healthy placenta (placentation). The “functional” layer ultimately comprises 2/3 of the full endometrial thickness and is the layer that sheds with menstruation in the event that no pregnancy occurs.

      The main causes of a “poor” uterine lining are:

      1.Damage to the basal endometrium as a result of:
      a.Inflammation of the endometrium (endometritis) most commonly resulting from infected products left over following abortion, miscarriage or birth
      b.Surgical trauma due to traumatic uterine scraping, (i.e. due to an over-aggressive D & C)
      2.Insensitivity of the basal endometrium to estrogen due to:
      a.Prolonged , over-use/misuse of clomiphene citrate
      b.Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). This is a drug that was given to pregnant women in the 1960’s to help prevent miscarriage
      3.Over-exposure of the uterine lining to ovarian male hormones (mainly testosterone): Older women, women with diminished ovarian reserve (poor responders) and women with polycystic ovarian syndrome -PCOS tend to have raised LH biological activity.. This causes the connective tissue in the ovary (stroma/theca) to overproduce testosterone. The effect can be further exaggerated when certain methods for ovarian stimulation such as agonist (Lupron/Buserelin) “flare” protocols and high dosages of menotropins such as Menopur are used in such cases.
      4.Reduced blood flow to the basal endometrium:
      Examples include;
      a.Multiple uterine fibroids - especially when these are present under the endometrium (submucosal)
      b.Uterine adenomyosis (excessive, abnormal invasion of the uterine muscle by endometrial glands).

      “The Viagra Connection”

      Treatments such supplementary estrogen therapy, aspirin administration and/or administration of high dosage gonadotropin fertility drugs, aimed at improving endometrial development have all yielded disappointing results.

      It was in the 90’s that Sildenafil (brand named Viagra) was gaining popularity as a treatment for erectile dysfunction. The mechanism by which it acted was through increasing penile blood flow through increasing nitric oxide activity. This prompted me to investigate whether Viagra administered vaginally, might similarly improve uterine blood flow and in the process cause more estrogen to be delivered to the basal endometrium and thereby increase endometrial thickening. We found that when Viagra was administered vaginally it did just that! However oral administration was without any significant benefit in this regard. We enlisted the services of a compound pharmacy to produce vaginal Viagra suppositories. Initially, four (4) women with chronic histories of poor endometrial development and failure to conceive following several advanced fertility treatments were evaluated for a period of 4-6 weeks and then underwent IVF with concomitant Viagra therapy. Viagra suppositories were administered four times daily for 8-11 days and were discontinued 5-7 days prior to embryo transfer in all cases.

      Our findings clearly demonstrated that vaginal Viagra produced a rapid and profound improvement in uterine blood flow and that was followed by enhanced endometrial development in all four cases. Three (3) of the four women subsequently conceived. . I expanded the trial in 2002 and became the first to report on the administration of vaginal Viagra to 105 women with repeated IVF failure due to persistently thin endometrial linings. All of the women had experienced at least two (2) prior IVF failures attributed to intractably thin uterine linings. About 70% of these women responded to treatment with Viagra suppositories with a marked improvement in endometrial thickness. Forty five percent (45%) achieved live births following a single cycle of IVF treatment with Viagra The miscarriage rate was 9%. None of the women who had failed to show an improvement in endometrial thickness following Viagra treatment achieved viable pregnancies.
      Following vaginal administration, Viagra is rapidly absorbed and quickly reaches the uterine blood system in high concentrations. Thereupon it dilutes out as it is absorbed into the systemic circulation. This probably explains why treatment is virtually devoid of systemic side effects

      Since the introduction of this form of treatment, thousands of women with thin uterine linings have been reported treated and many have gone on to have babies after repeated prior IVF failure.

      It is important to recognize that Viagra will NOT be effective in improving endometrial thickness in all cases. In fact, about one third of women treated fail to show any improvement. This is because in certain cases of thin uterine linings, the basal endometrium will have been permanently damaged and left unresponsive to estrogen. This happens in cases of severe endometrial damage due mainly to post-pregnancy endometritis (inflammation), chronic granulomatous inflammation due to uterine tuberculosis (hardly ever seen in the United States) and following extensive surgical injury to the basal endometrium (as sometimes occurs following over-zealous D&C’s).

      To be effective, Viagra must be administered vaginally. It is NOT effective when taken orally. We prescribe 20mg vaginal suppositories to be inserted four times per day. Treatment is commenced soon after menstruation ceases and is continued until the day of the “hCG trigger.” While ideally the treatment should be sustained throughout the first half of the cycle, most women will respond within 48-72 hours. For this reason, Viagra can be used to “rescue” a poor lining after the cycle has already started, provided that there is enough time remaining prior to ovulation, egg retrieval or progesterone administration.

      If you are interested in seeking my advice or services, I urge you to contact my concierge, Julie Dahan ASAP to set up a Skype or an in-person consultation with me. You can also contact Julie by phone or via email at 702-533-2691/ Julied@sherivf.com You can also apply online at http://www.SherIVF.com .
      *FYI
      The 4th edition of my newest book ,”In Vitro Fertilization, the ART of Making Babies” is available as a down-load through http://www.Amazon.com or from most bookstores and public libraries.

  2. Hi Dr. Sher,

    My first HCG level at around 4 weeks was 11 and 48 hours later it only went up to 18. Do you think is is viable?

    • It does not look good!

      Geoff Sher

  3. My husband and I are both 32 and have been trying to conceive via IVF for the last few years.
    IVF is our only option as I have had both Fallopian tubes and one ovary removed due to endometriosis and an ovarian cyst. We have done 9 transfers (some single and some double embryo) with 2 chemical pregnancies and one ectopic. I have a good AMH level and have tested negative for immune issues. I was taking prednisone, mortin, and baby asprin during the last few transfers just in case that was still an issue. My husband has low morphology but we have done ICSI each time. During one of the fresh cycles, we did PGS and all of our blasts were normal. All of the PGS tested blast, fresh or frozen, ended in negative tests.

    Our doctors suggested last summer to try using a gestational carrier which we did.
    We did one PGS tested FET which ended with a pregnancy sac with nothing inside and a natural miscarriage. Next we did a fresh transfer (with no PGS testing) with a negative result. Lastly, we tried a fresh transfer with 1 fresh blast and 1 PGS tested frozen blast. Again, the result was negative.

    Our doctors are at a loss for a next step. Where they were once convinced that my uterus was the issue, they now think that we have a genetic embryo/egg/sperm issue even with PGS testing,
    Is there anything they are missing?

    They mentioned egg or sperm donation, but with so many failed cycles with me and a GC, I have concerns over whether that is the answer. We most likely would not be using the GC again if we tried. (She has been so wonderful, but it is a lot to keep asking of her.)

    Thanks for any insight!

    • Hi Katelyn,

      In my opinion, you very, very likely have an immunologic implantation dysfunction.

      More than half of women who have endometriosis harbor antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) that can compromise development of the embryo’s root system (trophoblast). In addition and far more serious, is the fact that in about one third of cases endometriosis, regardless of its severity is associated with NKa and cytotoxic uterine lymphocytes (CTL) which can seriously jeopardize implantation. This immunologic implantation dysfunction (IID) is diagnosed by testing the woman’s blood for APA, for NKa (using the K-562 target cell test or by endometrial biopsy for cytokine activity) and, for CTL (by a blood immunophenotype). Activated NK cells attack the invading trophoblast cells (developing “root system” of the embryo/early conceptus) as soon as it tries to gain attachment to the uterine wall. In most cases, this results in rejection of the embryo even before the pregnancy is diagnosed and sometimes, in a chemical pregnancy or an early miscarriage. As such, many women with endometriosis, rather than being infertile, in the strict sense of the word, often actually experience repeated undetected “mini-miscarriages”.
      Women who harbor APA’s often experience improved IVF birth rates when heparinoids (Clexane/Lovenox) are administered from the onset of ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins until the 10th week of pregnancy. NKa is treated with a combination of Intralipid (IL) and steroid therapy: Intralipid (IL) is a solution of small lipid droplets suspended in water. When administered intravenously, IL provides essential fatty acids, linoleic acid (LA), an omega-6 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), an omega-3 fatty acid.IL is made up of 20% soybean oil/fatty acids (comprising linoleic acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, linolenic acid and stearic acid) , 1.2% egg yolk phospholipids (1.2%), glycerin (2.25%) and water (76.5%).IL exerts a modulating effect on certain immune cellular mechanisms largely by down-regulating NKa.
      The therapeutic effect of IL/steroid therapy is likely due to an ability to suppress pro-inflammatory cellular (Type-1) cytokines such as interferon gamma and TNF-alpha. IL/steroids down-regulates NKa within 2-3 weeks of treatment the vast majority of women experiencing immunologic implantation dysfunction. In this regard IL is just as effective as Intravenous Gamma globulin (IVIg) but at a fraction of the cost and with a far lower incidence of side-effects. Its effect lasts for 4-9 weeks when administered in early pregnancy.
      The toxic pelvic environment caused by endometriosis, profoundly reduces natural fertilization potential. As a result normally ovulating infertile women with endometriosis and patent Fallopian tubes are much less likely to conceive naturally, or by using fertility agents alone (with or without intrauterine (IUI) insemination. The only effective way to bypass this adverse pelvic environment is through IVF. I am not suggesting here that all women who have endometriosis require IVF! Rather, I am saying that in cases where the condition is further compromised by an IID associated with NKa and/or for older women(over 35y) who have diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) where time is of the essence, it is my opinion that IVF is the treatment of choice.

      The IVF Journey: The importance of “Planning the Trip” Before Taking the Ride”
      •Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) for IVF: Selecting the ideal protocol
      •IVF: Factors Affecting Egg/Embryo “competency” during Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS)
      •The Fundamental Requirements for Achieving Optimal IVF Success
      •Use of GnRH Antagonists (Ganirelix/Cetrotide/Orgalutron) in IVF-Ovarian Stimulation Protocols.
      •Ovarian Stimulation in Women Who have Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR): Introducing the Agonist/Antagonist Conversion protocol
      •Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) Measurement to Assess Ovarian Reserve and Design the Optimal Protocol for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) in IVF.
      •Human Growth Hormone Administration in IVF: Does it Enhances Egg/Embryo Quality and Outcome?
      •The BCP: Does Launching a Cycle of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS). Coming off the BCP Compromise Response?
      •Blastocyst Embryo Transfers should be the Standard of Care in IVF
      •IVF: How Many Attempts should be considered before Stopping?
      •“Unexplained” Infertility: Often a matter of the Diagnosis Being Overlooked!
      •IVF Failure and Implantation Dysfunction:
      •The Role of Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID) & Infertility (IID): PART 1-Background
      •Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID) & Infertility (IID): PART 2- Making a Diagnosis
      •Immunologic Dysfunction (IID) & Infertility (IID): PART 3-Treatment
      •Thyroid autoantibodies and Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID)
      •Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction: Importance of Meticulous Evaluation and Strategic Management 🙁 Case Report)
      •Intralipid and IVIG therapy: Understanding the Basis for its use in the Treatment of Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID)
      •Intralipid (IL) Administration in IVF: It’s Composition; how it Works; Administration; Side-effects; Reactions and Precautions
      •Natural Killer Cell Activation (NKa) and Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction in IVF: The Controversy!
      •Endometrial Thickness, Uterine Pathology and Immunologic Factors
      •Vaginally Administered Viagra is Often a Highly Effective Treatment to Help Thicken a Thin Uterine Lining
      •Treating Out-of-State and Out-of-Country Patients at Sher-IVF in Las Vegas:
      •A personalized, stepwise approach to IVF
      •How Many Embryos should be transferred: A Critical Decision in IVF?
      •The Role of Nutritional Supplements in Preparing for IVF
      •Endometriosis and Infertily
      •Endometriosis and Infertility: Why IVF Rather than IUI or Surgery Should be the Treatment of Choice.
      •Endometriosis and Infertility: The Influence of Age and Severity on Treatment Options
      •Early -Endometriosis-related Infertility: Ovulation Induction (with or without Intrauterine Insemination) and Reproductive Surgery Versus IVF
      •Treating Ovarian Endometriomas with Sclerotherapy.

      If you are interested in seeking my advice or services, I urge you to contact my concierge, Julie Dahan ASAP to set up a Skype or an in-person consultation with me. You can also contact Julie by phone or via email at 702-533-2691/ Julied@sherivf.com You can also apply online at http://www.SherIVF.com .

      *FYI
      The 4th edition of my newest book ,”In Vitro Fertilization, the ART of Making Babies” is available as a down-load through http://www.Amazon.com or from most bookstores and public libraries.

      Geoffrey Sher MD

  4. Hi Dr Sher,
    What would you say is the optimum lining measurement for a successful 5 day FET?
    Thank you!

    • In my opinion it needs to be >8mm and ideally >9mm.

      Geoff Sher

  5. Sorry for bothering again. We did another urine test on the 8th day after the blastocyst embryo transfer. Came out negative again (the test is sensitive to detect a minimum of 25ml hcg). Her next period is due in 4 days. She is having symptoms like pre period symptoms. An achne on her forehead, breast tenderness and bloating. Her blood hcg is after 12 days of the transfer. Is there any chance to be pregnant or not likely? Thanks in advance

    • Possible but not likely that she is pregnant!

      Geoff Sher